The Basics:
As this chart indicates, there is a high degree of correlation between math proficiency rates and student poverty rates (as measured by participation in the Free and Reduced Lunch program). This is largely because students from economically disadvantaged households often start their school careers a year or more behind their peers, and are not given the kind of intensive instruction they need to catch up. Students’ entry points are not the fault of schools; however, there are instructional methods available that can help them catch up to their peers and significantly improve their academic (and life) trajectory, and those methods have been largely ignored. Readers interested in learning more can visit www/education-consumers.org/ECF_DI.htm. Improving proficiency rates in core skills by third grade is the single most effective change schools can make to improve later outcomes. And, as other schools and districts have shown, it is entirely within their power to do so if they are willing to explore alternate approaches to this age-old problem.
Clicking the box “The Goal: 90%+ Proficiency” indicates an achievable goal for schools, one that schools elsewhere have met by instituting proven methods such as Direct Instruction. See information on schools in Kennewick, Washington as detailed in the book “Annual Growth, Catch-Up Growth” and as referenced at www/education-consumers.org/ECF_DI.htm.
|