|  The Basics:  The school performance scores displayed in this chart were  downloaded in February 2015 from the California Department of Education's website  (here); the free/reduced lunch data was downloaded from here. Those interested  in reviewing reports on individual schools can search here. These agencies make  such data available to the public as a matter of policy. The Education  Consumers Foundation simply displays that which is publicly available in a  consumer-friendly way. 
        Each dot represents a school's reading  proficiency rate for all studentsDots to the right have higher rates of low income  students, as measured by the California Department of EducationDots toward the top have higher rates of students who are  proficient or advanced on the state's reading test.  About the Chart
 Learning  to read is one of the highest priorities of elementary school. Students who do  not master reading are at a substantially higher risk of academic failure in  high school.
 As indicated by this chart,  reading proficiency is correlated with economic disadvantage.  Schools  with higher percentages of economically advantaged students have higher  proficiency rates in reading.  The exceptions, however, are  important.  Schools with the same proportion of disadvantaged students may  differ by 50-60 points in proficiency rate. 
 Students from economically disadvantaged households are frequently a  grade-level or more behind their more advantaged peers at entry to preschool or  kindergarten.  Plainly, schools are not responsible for these differences,  but they are responsible for providing the  educational experiences that  will enable disadvantaged  and other struggling readers to catch up  with their peers.  Unfortunately, teaching methodologies that can  close these gaps are little used.  Users interested in learning more  about early reading instruction alternatives should go  here.
 
 Improving third grade reading proficiency rates is arguably the single most  cost-effective change a school can make to improve overall achievement outcomes. Better readers gain greater  benefit from school. Users interested in more informationon improving outcomes are strongly encouraged to read "Annual Growth, Catch-Up Growth" by Lynn Fielding.
 Reading the Chart
 The horizontal scale  (x-axis) represents the percentage of a school's students who are identified by the California Department of  Education as members of a low income  family. “Low income families” are defined as such  by participation in the  federal Free and Reduced Lunch program or other form of public assistance (see here).
 The vertical scale (y-axis)  represents the percentage of a school's students who are "proficient"  or "advanced" in reading--as defined by the California Department  of Education.  These are the students who have mastered reading and are prepared to advance to  the next grade.   
 
 |